{"id":28622,"date":"2026-10-17T19:38:12","date_gmt":"2026-10-17T19:38:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/2026\/10\/17\/meta-challenges-ofcoms-fine-maths-in-court-courthouse-news-reports\/"},"modified":"2026-10-17T19:38:12","modified_gmt":"2026-10-17T19:38:12","slug":"meta-challenges-ofcoms-fine-maths-in-court-courthouse-news-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/2026\/10\/17\/meta-challenges-ofcoms-fine-maths-in-court-courthouse-news-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"Meta challenges Ofcom\u2019s fine maths in court, Courthouse News reports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Credit: kovop\/Shutterstock Meta asked the High Court in London this week to limit how Ofcom calculates online safety fees and maximum fines, Courthouse News reported. The hearing ended late on Wednesday after a day and a half of arguments. It is about Ofcom\u2019s use of worldwide revenue, not a specific fine. The Online Safety Act lets Ofcom fine a company up to 10% of its qualifying worldwide revenue or \u00a318m, whichever is greater.<\/p>\n<p>Ofcom also recovers the cost of running the regime through fees based on companies\u2019 revenue. Meta took Ofcom to court over the calculation earlier this year. Meta\u2019s case Meta argues that Ofcom read its powers too broadly when it defined qualifying worldwide revenue. It also challenges how Ofcom calculates fines when several services owned by one company are held jointly liable.<\/p>\n<p>In court documents, Meta\u2019s lawyer Monica Carss-Frisk called Ofcom\u2019s approach \u201ctroubling\u201d. She said it could lead to \u201ccompanies such as Meta bearing the vast majority of Ofcom\u2019s costs\u201d, although the law covers many internet services in the UK. Meta said it was committed to cooperating with Ofcom. Fees and penalties should reflect the services regulated in the countries where they operate, the company argues.<\/p>\n<p>A UK-based calculation would still let Ofcom impose substantial penalties, it said. Ofcom\u2019s reply Ofcom says Meta is incorrect and that it \u201cstruck a careful balance\u201d. The rules set the maximum possible fine, not the amount imposed, the regulator said in court filings. Its lawyer called Meta\u2019s challenge to Ofcom\u2019s expertise \u201coutlandish\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Outside court, an Ofcom spokesperson said the regulator would defend its reasoning and decisions. 5Rights Foundation, a children\u2019s rights group, has permission to intervene on Ofcom\u2019s side. \u201cThe Online Safety Act cannot be a paper tiger. Parliament intended it to provide a strong deterrent.\u201d Leanda Barrington-Leach, executive director of 5Rights Foundation What an expert said Meta\u2019s broadest challenge would be hard to sustain, Alexandros Antoniou, a senior lecturer in media law at the University of Essex, told Courthouse News. \u201cParliament gave Ofcom a long measuring tape.\u201d Alexandros Antoniou, University of Essex, to Courthouse News But Antoniou said Meta has a case on how Ofcom defines the revenue it can count. Meta recently joined TikTok and X in a separate challenge over how much information Ofcom can demand. Ofcom is also investigating Instagram Instants.<\/p>\n<p>A judgment in the fees case is expected later. Get the TNW newsletter \u2715 Close Get the TNW newsletter Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Credit: kovop\/Shutterstock Meta asked the High Court in London this week to limit how Ofcom calculates online safety fees and maximum fines, Courthouse News reported. The hearing ended late on Wednesday after a day and\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28623,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28622\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28623"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/demo.tcjhomeaccents.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}